The aim of the journal is to contribute
to the study of totalitarian ideologies and regimes in Europe in the 20th
century, especially based on primary archival and oral sources, on content
analysis of the discourse of the totalitarian regimes, but also on new
theoretical framework coming from such subfields of history as intellectual
history, the history of ideas as well as political science, sociology and
anthropology. The term totalitarian is understood here in a broader sense and
refers to such political ideologies and regimes like Communism and Fascism (of
which Nazism was one of the versions) that tried to impose a total control on
society, including on private life. From this perspective it is less important
that all these tentative to control all aspects of societal and individual life
failed, it is more important the extent to which these regimes succeeded in
their endeavours. Totalitarian covers also other regimes that practiced
repressions and justified the use of violence at mass and individual level for
political purposes (Gulag and Holocaust). It is particular interesting to
differentiate the discourse and practices of the totalitarian regimes and
democratic ones. The two types of regimes should be seen however not as
essences, but rather as Weberian ideal-types. In other words, as Giovanni
Sartori expressed it aptly, there are no pure democratic regimes and pure
authoritarian/totalitarian regimes; there are regimes with democratic
tendencies and regimes with authoritarian/totalitarian tendencies. In this
sense, the articles and book reviews on topics related to the challenges from
totalitarian and authoritarian regimes to democracy are also welcome.
Last, but not least, Dystopia will pay a special attention also to commonalities and
differences between various national versions of Communism and Fascism,
relations between Communist states, between Fascist regimes and between the
former and the latter.